<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Five Companies We&#8217;d Be Better Off Without, #1: The U.S. Postal Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.punny.org/money/top-five-companies-wed-be-better-off-without-1-the-us-postal-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.punny.org/money/top-five-companies-wed-be-better-off-without-1-the-us-postal-service/</link>
	<description>Adding a punchline to your bottom line</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:15:52 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Punny Poll #35: Can You Survive on Five-Day-A-Week Mail? &#124; Punny Money</title>
		<link>http://www.punny.org/money/top-five-companies-wed-be-better-off-without-1-the-us-postal-service/comment-page-1/#comment-260694</link>
		<dc:creator>Punny Poll #35: Can You Survive on Five-Day-A-Week Mail? &#124; Punny Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 04:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punny.org/money/top-five-companies-wed-be-better-off-without-1-the-us-postal-service/#comment-260694</guid>
		<description>[...] poll at this rate) is inspired by recent talks by the U.S. Postal Service&#8212;voted the #1 company we&#8217;d be better off without in 2007 by important scientists&#8212;that it might switch to five-times-a-week delivery to cut [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] poll at this rate) is inspired by recent talks by the U.S. Postal Service&#8212;voted the #1 company we&#8217;d be better off without in 2007 by important scientists&#8212;that it might switch to five-times-a-week delivery to cut [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: commercial real estate</title>
		<link>http://www.punny.org/money/top-five-companies-wed-be-better-off-without-1-the-us-postal-service/comment-page-1/#comment-260344</link>
		<dc:creator>commercial real estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punny.org/money/top-five-companies-wed-be-better-off-without-1-the-us-postal-service/#comment-260344</guid>
		<description>President Reagan proposed closing the post office ... still a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Reagan proposed closing the post office &#8230; still a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuff Worth Reading, Because This Website Is Being Repossessed &#124; Punny Money</title>
		<link>http://www.punny.org/money/top-five-companies-wed-be-better-off-without-1-the-us-postal-service/comment-page-1/#comment-95840</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuff Worth Reading, Because This Website Is Being Repossessed &#124; Punny Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 18:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punny.org/money/top-five-companies-wed-be-better-off-without-1-the-us-postal-service/#comment-95840</guid>
		<description>[...] Little known fact: the United States Postal Service uses sharks and alligators to sort your mail, something Money, Matter, and More Musings found out the hard way. Just another reason why the postal service is the #1 company we&#8217;d be better off without. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Little known fact: the United States Postal Service uses sharks and alligators to sort your mail, something Money, Matter, and More Musings found out the hard way. Just another reason why the postal service is the #1 company we&#8217;d be better off without. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carnival of Personal Finance #93 at Tired but Happy at Clever Dude</title>
		<link>http://www.punny.org/money/top-five-companies-wed-be-better-off-without-1-the-us-postal-service/comment-page-1/#comment-52811</link>
		<dc:creator>Carnival of Personal Finance #93 at Tired but Happy at Clever Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punny.org/money/top-five-companies-wed-be-better-off-without-1-the-us-postal-service/#comment-52811</guid>
		<description>[...] PFAdvice (and his commentors) give a good rundown of why the Forever Stamp isn&#8217;t a good buy. Maybe that&#8217;s why the Post Office is the the #1 company we could do without [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PFAdvice (and his commentors) give a good rundown of why the Forever Stamp isn&#8217;t a good buy. Maybe that&#8217;s why the Post Office is the the #1 company we could do without [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; When Frugality Is A Fault: Certified v. Regular Mail&#160;on&#160;Blueprint for Financial Prosperity</title>
		<link>http://www.punny.org/money/top-five-companies-wed-be-better-off-without-1-the-us-postal-service/comment-page-1/#comment-43302</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; When Frugality Is A Fault: Certified v. Regular Mail&#160;on&#160;Blueprint for Financial Prosperity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 21:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punny.org/money/top-five-companies-wed-be-better-off-without-1-the-us-postal-service/#comment-43302</guid>
		<description>[...] Anyway, I was very very tempted to just slap a thirty-nine cent stamp on the letter and mail it off but I thought better of it. While I&#8217;m pretty sure that there was a 99% chance the letter would make it there without any problems (I have faith in the USPS, even if Nick doesn&#8217;t), do I really want to deal with the hassle in that 1% case? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Anyway, I was very very tempted to just slap a thirty-nine cent stamp on the letter and mail it off but I thought better of it. While I&#8217;m pretty sure that there was a 99% chance the letter would make it there without any problems (I have faith in the USPS, even if Nick doesn&#8217;t), do I really want to deal with the hassle in that 1% case? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Post Office Software Dev</title>
		<link>http://www.punny.org/money/top-five-companies-wed-be-better-off-without-1-the-us-postal-service/comment-page-1/#comment-40417</link>
		<dc:creator>Post Office Software Dev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 04:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punny.org/money/top-five-companies-wed-be-better-off-without-1-the-us-postal-service/#comment-40417</guid>
		<description>I work for a company that makes software for USPS customers (think TurboTax but for mail).  USPS is a huge operation, charged with running as a business while providing public services and considerations other businesses would scoff at.  Discounts for nonprofits?  Reduced rates for periodicals and newspapers?  Required by law to allow shipment of scorpions?  Must open a new post office for every postcode?  Free mail for the blind and congresspeople?

I hope the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006 (and their planned network reorganization for this year or next) gives USPS the ability to improve service and reduce prices.

I&#039;m also excited about Forever Stamps, a new first-class stamp that will work across rate increases.  I don&#039;t look forward to finding 3-cent stamps for the next rate increase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work for a company that makes software for USPS customers (think TurboTax but for mail).  USPS is a huge operation, charged with running as a business while providing public services and considerations other businesses would scoff at.  Discounts for nonprofits?  Reduced rates for periodicals and newspapers?  Required by law to allow shipment of scorpions?  Must open a new post office for every postcode?  Free mail for the blind and congresspeople?</p>
<p>I hope the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006 (and their planned network reorganization for this year or next) gives USPS the ability to improve service and reduce prices.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also excited about Forever Stamps, a new first-class stamp that will work across rate increases.  I don&#8217;t look forward to finding 3-cent stamps for the next rate increase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stingy Student</title>
		<link>http://www.punny.org/money/top-five-companies-wed-be-better-off-without-1-the-us-postal-service/comment-page-1/#comment-40405</link>
		<dc:creator>Stingy Student</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punny.org/money/top-five-companies-wed-be-better-off-without-1-the-us-postal-service/#comment-40405</guid>
		<description>I agree with Lazy Man, the flat rate thing is a good thing because it still allows people in the middle of nowhere to send letters anywhere for a mere $0.39.  Imagine if this were a free market, no one would service those people living out there just like insurance companies don&#039;t offer new policies to people with HIV, cancer, or who work as stunt doubles.  Try making a delivery to someone in a country where the postal system isn&#039;t so great, and you&#039;ll get what I&#039;m saying.  Otherwise, I agree with your points, but I still think the benefits outweigh the negatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Lazy Man, the flat rate thing is a good thing because it still allows people in the middle of nowhere to send letters anywhere for a mere $0.39.  Imagine if this were a free market, no one would service those people living out there just like insurance companies don&#8217;t offer new policies to people with HIV, cancer, or who work as stunt doubles.  Try making a delivery to someone in a country where the postal system isn&#8217;t so great, and you&#8217;ll get what I&#8217;m saying.  Otherwise, I agree with your points, but I still think the benefits outweigh the negatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lazy Man and Money</title>
		<link>http://www.punny.org/money/top-five-companies-wed-be-better-off-without-1-the-us-postal-service/comment-page-1/#comment-40390</link>
		<dc:creator>Lazy Man and Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 20:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punny.org/money/top-five-companies-wed-be-better-off-without-1-the-us-postal-service/#comment-40390</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not convinced the flat rate thing is bad.  If I had to pay variable pricing for locations and weight, I could never figure out what it would be and would have to go to the post office (or equivalent) to figure out how much postage is required.  That&#039;s going to cost me more in time, gas, and effort than a few 39 cent stamps.  Of course if it gets to $86, we&#039;ll have to raise the issue, but can you think of a better system than the flat rate one?  Perhaps we should all have mail scales and online calculators (though those without Internet access would be penalized by not being able to calculate the rate).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not convinced the flat rate thing is bad.  If I had to pay variable pricing for locations and weight, I could never figure out what it would be and would have to go to the post office (or equivalent) to figure out how much postage is required.  That&#8217;s going to cost me more in time, gas, and effort than a few 39 cent stamps.  Of course if it gets to $86, we&#8217;ll have to raise the issue, but can you think of a better system than the flat rate one?  Perhaps we should all have mail scales and online calculators (though those without Internet access would be penalized by not being able to calculate the rate).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
