Net Worth Is NOT Wealth: How to Determine Your Total Measure of Wealth
Author: Nick
Category: Money
Topics: wealth

Yesterday I rocked the personal finance world by claiming that net worth is a poor measure of wealth. The classic net worth calculation of assets minus liabilities simply omits too much important information to provide a useful picture of your financial situation.
A lot of people like calculating their net worth, watching it grow, and feeling a sense of accomplishment if it goes up by a certain amount. I wouldn’t dream of robbing anyone of this pleasure, but I would like to propose a more complete set of criteria from which you can determine your Total Measure of Wealth™. (What, did you think I was kidding about turning this into a book deal eventually?)
The Keys to Your Total Measure of Wealth
To start putting together a complete measurement of your wealth, let’s come up with a list of all the aspects of your life that have some sort of bearing on your financial status. Here are the ones I came up with off the top of my head:
- Net worth. Alone, net worth provides only a small fraction of your complete wealth picture. But that assets minus liabilities figure does give you a useful starting point for your calculations.
- Income. Which would you rather have: a net worth of $100,000 with an income of zero or a net worth of $20,000 with an annual income of $100,000? Just looking at the net worth figure, you’d think the first case is better than the second. Then you throw in the incomes and suddenly you might be comparing somebody who’s unemployed to someone with a six-figure job.
- Job status. Even income isn’t enough to give a full picture of your employment situation. Do you like your job? Will you still have it in six months? If you lost your job tomorrow, could you find a comparable one quickly? You might have a high salary, but if you hate what you do, your boss doesn’t like you, there’s little room for growth, and no other company is hiring for your position, then you’re on financially shaky ground.
- Personal savings rate. The U.S. personal savings rate fell below 0% last year which means Americans are spending more than they earn. How much of your paycheck do you save? A positive net worth means nothing if it’s accompanied by a negative savings rate–well, except that you’ll be broke sometime in the future.
- Rate of return (ROR). Which is more money: $500,000 with an annual ROR of 10% or $1 million sitting under a mattress? Your answer will be different today than it will be ten years from now. A high net worth is great, but an increasing net worth is even better.
- Housing status. I’m a big proponent of owning your own home as a cornerstone of building wealth, but there are plenty of homeowners out there who are worse off than renters. Maybe you bought at the peak of the housing market in a “bubble” city, and now your house is worth 30% less than you paid for it. Or perhaps you have one of those fancy mortgages where you never pay a dime toward the principle. In these cases, a renter with a good job and money in the bank might be in a better financial situation than you.
- Family status. A $50,000-a-year income goes a lot further if you’re single and without kids than if you’re married with six children. Determining how many people count on you for their financial well-being is a vital aspect of a true wealth calculation.
- Self-reliance. You may have few people depending on you bringing home the bacon, but how many people do you rely on for your livelihood? Furthermore, do you rely on just one person or entity for your entire livelihood? Things that help make you more self-reliant: being self-employed, growing some or all of your own food, or diversifying your income sources.
- Locale. I think it goes without saying that a dollar will get you more in Atlanta than it will in Beverly Hills. But there are other factors to consider than just cost of living. What sort of services does your local, state, or national government provide? How much do you pay in taxes? What are the bankruptcy laws like? At what rate is real estate appreciating in your neighborhood? How oppressive has your local warlord been lately?
- Age. $100,000 in the bank does a lot more for a 30-year-old than it does for someone nearing retirement age. Throwing age into the wealth equation is a great way to ensure that worth calculations can be used by anyone, young or old.
- Financial education. Here’s one key to wealth that few ever consider, but it can have a huge impact on what you do with your money. Even a moderate level of financial education (e.g. you read Punny Money frequently) can set you apart from those who were brought up to spend every penny they make. You wouldn’t need an MBA to score high here–just a basic understanding of concepts like credit, investing, the economy, and similar topics.
- Health. Unless you’re fantastically rich and legally dubious, you can’t buy good health. Then again, all the money in the world can’t undo a lifetime of poor health choices. And while certain health issues are hard to prevent, being prepared with adequate insurance can go a long way toward financial stability.
- Credit. This one should be easy to figure out thanks to credit scores, right? Maybe not as easy as you think. Which credit scoring scale do you use? How would you apply the score to your wealth measurement? And how do you account for things a credit score doesn’t consider, like cases where your score reflects that you messed up years ago with some unpaid bills but you have since committed to a life of financial harmony?
- Personal outlook. Remember our hypothetical dictator friend from yesterday’s episode of Which Person Is Richer? He may be filthy rich, but he probably isn’t enjoying a life of looking over his shoulder, waiting for an assassin’s bullet. As many a celebrity can tell you, a life of fame and fortune doesn’t guarantee a life of happiness. And I know plenty of people who absolutely love their lives yet they live paycheck to paycheck. Your personal outlook, your financial aspirations, your dreams for the future–these things give your life meaning and direction and are a crucial part of your fiscal picture.
If you can think of any other criteria that should be on this list, please leave a comment with a quick explanation and the best ones will join this list.
Putting a Number on Your Total Measure of Wealth
It wouldn’t really be a measure if there weren’t some kind of number that came out of doing it. Net worth, income, and age are all straightforward to compute; but how do we enumerate things like family, health, and personal outlook?
Putting a number of these things is actually easier than you might think. Corporations assign numbers to you for these and other parts of your life all the time. For example, if you apply for a life insurance policy, the underwriter will examine your medical history and come up with a score that represents the likelihood that you’ll live long enough to be profitable to the company. These “scores” might not be as trivial to calculate as net worth, but isn’t a little extra work worth the reward of getting a complete picture of your finances?
In coming weeks, we’ll start looking at the keys above individually and come up with a mathematical formula for calculating your Total Measure of Wealth.

7 Responses »
1.
The Sarcasticynic
March 15th, 2007 at 3:58 pm
“Which would you rather have: a net worth of $100,000 with an income of zero or a net worth of $20,000 with an annual income of $100,000?”
If I had a net worth of twenty grand and an annual income of a hundred grand, I’d sure hope I was “living the life” spending that kind of dough.
2.
Jeff
April 6th, 2007 at 11:49 am
Well, I see your point here, but its not one without a lot of flaws. A logarithm trying to calculate net worth based on the above factors is probably about as simple as solving for PI. For example, you mention financial education. There were a lot of people that graduated in my finance classes that still don’t know the basics to credit. I know business owners who don’t pay attention to finance “book basics” but who are very savvy business people. You are trying to quantify things that can’t be quantified. I recently saw an equation that attempted to predict doomsday. There are so many variables that happen on a day to day basis that makes this estimate impossible. If if you were to develop a formula, what would the numbers mean. If you scored 100, would this mean that you are making an ample amount of income, you own your house and have no difficulty paying bills, you are financial savvy, you are in a great location, you are healthy (even though you sit and worry about where you are at on this scale and what it all means). I think it is a very interesting concept, but I think there are two many variables that mean different things to different people. Money is pretty universal. If you have a lot of net worth, are happy with what you are doing, and are happy, then I give you a thumbs up.
3.
Nick
April 6th, 2007 at 11:56 am
It would be very difficult to come up with a single “score” for your entire financial picture. A better choice would be to come up with scores for each aspect of your wealth status, and that’s more like what we’re going to do here.
Sorry for the delay on the next part, folks. I’m doing a lot of behind-the-scenes work for the rest of the series, but the next part on Job Status will be ready early next week.
4.
Anthony
February 16th, 2008 at 7:20 pm
Family status. A $50,000-a-year income goes a lot further if you’re single and without kids than if you’re married with six children. Determining how many people count on you for their financial well-being is a vital aspect of a true wealth calculation.
I like the idea of having a higher income alright. It seems
though, as far as I can tell, that the lower income brackets
have the most children; a situation that does not augur well for building wealth or net worth. A notable exception is Dr. Steven Covey of “the 7 Habits” fame, who has either 9 or 10
children, and seems to have made all the right moves.
Thanks for your article.
Anthony
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>Trackbacks & Pingbacks
The Confusing Process Of Measuring Net Worth & Financial Progress…
By Teri Newton
I have been searching the web for months, looking for ways to measure my financial progress, and have come up pretty empty handed. By merely looking at my peers and neighbors there is no doubt we are far ahead of the curve. On the other …
Trackback by Personal Finance Advice — May 8, 2007 @ 12:30 pm
[...] Net Worth Is NOT Wealth: How to Determine Your Total Measure of Wealth by Nick @ Punny Money. [...]
Pingback by What Is The Worth Of *Net Worth* If It Is Not Usable? — May 16, 2007 @ 2:21 pm
[...] I think the most interesting article I found about our true measure of wealth was an article at Punny Money. I just had to share because this was such an excellent piece, that argues that income potential, [...]
Pingback by The Confusing Process Of Measuring Net Worth & Financial Progress - SavingAdvice.com Blog — August 28, 2008 @ 10:03 pm