Gripe Time: The Shame of Partial RSS Feeds
Author: Nick
Category: Money
Topics: internet
![full feeds now full feeds now full feeds [...] visit the website to continue reading this alt text hahahahaha](http://www.punny.org/wp-content/images/small/w/www.png "full feeds now full feeds now full feeds [...] visit the website to continue reading this alt text hahahahaha")
Do you use an RSS feed reader to keep up with your favorite websites? If so, then you’ve probably encountered a few different feeds in your days.
Some will allow you to read the entire text of new articles right from your reader, while others will only syndicate a few sentences and ask you to visit the website for the full text. Writers who only offer partial feeds likely do so because they believe full feeds would lower their advertising revenue.
There is a sort of petition making the rounds on the internet aimed at convincing providers of web content to syndicate their updates using full feeds only. I quickly added myself to the list of supporters, though I feel I should explain why I did so considering I am one of those providers of web content who should be worrying about lost advertising income.
Why I Like Reading Full Feeds Better
The reason I prefer reading full feeds over partial feeds is simple: it’s probably the only thing that’s going to get me to read the full article. I’ve been tracking my own feed reading habits in recent weeks, and I estimate that I’ve only clicked through partial feeds to read the full article about 1% of the time. As for writers who syndicate using full feeds, I read their entire articles from my reader roughly 20-30% of the time. On top of that, I clicked through full feeds to the site about 5% of the time in order to leave a comment on the full article I just read.
Why Web Content Providers Should Provide Full Feeds
The idea that advertising revenue will be lost by providing full RSS feeds is a myth. Here’s why:
- Reader clickthroughs actually higher with full feeds. In reality, you will probably see more clickthroughs to your site via full feeds that encourage your readers to read your entire article and visit your site in order to leave comments or ask questions.
- No pictures. I also noticed I’m about five times more likely to click through an article that has a picture in it compared to one that does not. Partial feeds generally mean you don’t syndicate pictures in your posts.
- A few sentences just aren’t enough. How do you expect three lines of text to catch my eye when I have full-text posts complete with pictures on either side of your article in my reader? It’s like trying to find a dwarf in a room full of sumo wrestlers; I’d rather give up the search and have fun with the wrestlers instead!
- Most writers open weakly. If you syndicate partial feeds, the only things you have to hook me into reading the rest of your article are a title and a few sentences. Unfortunately most web content providers don’t write sensational titles or opening lines that really draw in their readers. (No offense, writers; I’m probably in that boat, too.)
- Partial feeds don’t prevent content theft. I know a few writers who switched to partial feeds because they had their content stolen by other websites who simply republished their full feeds. This is not an effective way to deal with content theft. Instead, you should report the content thief to their advertising partners (likely Google AdSense) who will cancel their account and eliminate the reason for them to republish your feed in the first place.
- You can now advertise within full RSS feeds. There are several programs in place offering web content providers the ability to monetize (that is, make money from) their RSS feeds. My favorite are the non-obtrusive Feedvertising links provided by Text Link Ads.
My Challenge to Readers and Writers
Writers who syndicate partial feeds, here’s my challenge to you. Try turning on full feeds for a month and see what effect it has on your clickthrough rate. Be sure to take note of your comment frequency and your RSS subscriber count before and after you begin your trial run with full feeds. If you see a positive change, I hope you’ll stick with full feeds so that your readers may benefit from their convenience and you may benefit from having more of your content read.
Readers who don’t like partial feeds, contact web content providers who only syndicate using partial feeds and point them to this article. Ask them to consider a trial run with full feeds. And add your name to the petition at fullfeeds.com to help encourage other web content providers to go full feed.
And finally, don’t forget to subscribe directly to Punny Money’s full RSS feed. It’s the only way through which you can view the full content (pictures and all!) of Punny Money’s articles directly from your favorite RSS reader.
(Thanks to Freshblog for inspiring this article.)
Loading ...
26 Responses »
1.
Terry
October 5th, 2006 at 6:03 pm
Thank you for writing about this! I thought I was all alone in hating partial feeds and I, too, rarely click out of an partial feed to see the whole thing. Let us know how your challenge goes.
2.
Cap
October 6th, 2006 at 10:28 pm
same shoe here. I prefer to have full feeds. the main reason why I provide the full feed is also because I’d much rather readers read the post via a feed reader than from the crappy blog layout (it’s just too freaking ugly).
3.
Cap
October 6th, 2006 at 10:29 pm
although I forgot to note, I think a lot of people decide to go w/ partial feed because they don’t want spam blogs stealing their contents.
4.
NCN
October 9th, 2006 at 6:10 pm
Punny Money,
I hate feeds altogether. (Except for awesome podcasts, of course!)
I always want to pronoune it “PUE-KNEE” Money,
NCN
This comment is part of my 100 Comments Series over at No Credit Needed.
5.
Jonathan
October 22nd, 2006 at 4:33 am
I try to compromise by giving out a decent chunk of the post for longer posts, and the whole post for shorter posts. I’m actually polling my blog readers about this right now, and surprisingly more people like my feed the way it is vs. full feeds (out of those that actually know what RSS is and who care). This may also be due to the longer excerpts, as opposed to the 10 word sentences some blogs have.
I’ll add that e-mailing Adsense does nothing. Zip. Nada. They don’t care, they don’t want to get into the middle, whatever. I have at least 3 blogs just recycling my content as I type, and they’re nothing I can do.
6.
skintbint
October 27th, 2006 at 4:48 am
Realkly useful article. I’d just been thinking yesterday which kind of feed I should have of my blog but now the answer seems so obvious.
I find that as a reader I often click through to blogs which publish their full stories by rss to look at their blogrolls and to generally check out what the rest of the site looks like.
7.
twink
June 13th, 2010 at 12:12 am
it’s just too freaking ugly
8.
دردشة
December 22nd, 2010 at 1:32 pm
Thanks for what is published of a strong information and wonderful
9.
zara
March 25th, 2011 at 11:07 pm
http://www.vibramfivefingershoes2011.com/
10.
haiying
April 12th, 2011 at 5:05 am
http://www.mylouisvuittonoutlet-sale.com/
11.
xx
April 27th, 2011 at 1:21 am
http://www.coachpursestores.com/
12.
zara
May 14th, 2011 at 4:31 am
http://www.burberrybags-store.com/
13.
zara
July 1st, 2011 at 4:14 am
http://www.hermeslove.com/
14.
burberry outlet
July 9th, 2011 at 7:36 am
let’s go
15.
Alexander McQueen
July 28th, 2011 at 2:44 am
I find that as a reader I often click through to blogs which publish their full stories by rss to look at their blogrolls and to generally check out what the rest of the site looks like.
16.
Belstaff coat
September 19th, 2011 at 10:12 pm
I find that as a reader I often click through to blogs which publish their full stories by rss to look at their blogrolls and to generally check out what the rest of the site looks like.
17.
Live-Audio
October 1st, 2011 at 1:03 pm
Thanks for the post. I’ve been looking into doing RSS feeds for a couple of websites and these will be important points to consider, especially since I wouldn’t have thought to look into advertising on feeds. I just didn’t realize it could be done. Any updates since the original post? Is this still possible and what networks offer this, anyone?
P.S. @zaiying, xx, burberry outlet, zara, fascinating and insightful commentary as always. Love ya.
18.
doudoune moncler homme
October 7th, 2011 at 9:30 pm
Acheter à prix moins cher les produits moncler avec http://www.monclerfemme-france.com.com Nos offres bottes doudoune moncler sont mises à jour quotidiennement pour acheter pas cher vos produits préférés. Profitez la grande marque doudoune moncler femme de bonne qualité. doudoune moncler homme, classique, longue et courte. Livraison rapide, paiement sécurisé. Nous vous remercions de votre visite et nous espérons votre prochain achat.
19.
Monster Beats Online
October 13th, 2011 at 10:14 pm
Best wishes to you in the future, this is really interesting blog.
20.
belstaff jackets
October 17th, 2011 at 2:58 am
At the view subject of viewpoint, this in-ear headphones have been impeccable. Can be said is a flawless configuration for current leaning to and sound . Of course, the sound has a little flaw is still there.
21.
Monster Sale
October 17th, 2011 at 3:04 am
Monster beats studio bass is very good, strong, clear and flexible. Made me surprise,In the vocal and well likeable music performence, the Monster beats Studio better than any one headphones of Monster series.
22.
Air Max Jordan Fusion
October 21st, 2011 at 9:58 pm
Live as though you intend to live forever, and work as though your strength were limit less. Other man live to eat, while I eat to live.
23.
Canada Goose Youth's Chilliwack Bomber
October 25th, 2011 at 11:00 pm
For over 50 years, Canada Goose Canada Goose Jackets On Sale Women’s Chilliwack Bomber has been committed to producing the best expedition parkas, arctic gear, extreme cold weather down jackets and high quality outerwear in the world. http://www.canada-goose-ca.org Canada Goose Parka
24.
صور
January 1st, 2012 at 8:55 pm
Monster beats studio bass is very good, strong, clear and flexible. Made me surprise,In the vocal and well likeable music performence, the Monster beats Studio better than any one headphones of Monster series.
إستايلات المنتديات
25.
شات
January 28th, 2012 at 9:46 am
good man this topic very good
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>Trackbacks & Pingbacks
[...] Punny Money, I hate feeds altogether. (Except for awesome podcasts, of [...]
Pingback by No Credit Needed » Blog Archive » 100 Comments Series Part 4 — June 12, 2007 @ 1:48 pm